Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
81. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mini Vordul wrote: My point was that no answer at all from CCP is an answer in and of itself and that answer is 'stfu'. ignoring a thread they created is not an "answer".
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.17 18:41:00
|
82. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sexy Cakes wrote: Argus Sorn wrote: CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year. This except take out the basically part. CCP considers this matter resolve...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.16 21:05:00
|
83. CFC Declares War on N3. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Faceless Parmala wrote: How CFC wins anything is beyond me... the stupidity of the average line members is just so damn funny. then realise half of them are even worse than that....
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 20:42:00
|
84. "DSCAN DISRUPTOR" in patch Rubicon 1.1. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: We already have a thread for half (and whole) decent suggestions: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=295535&find=unread So how exactly did the new rapid light and rapid h...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 20:02:00
|
85. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steve Ronuken wrote: Kate stark wrote: Anya Klibor wrote: From SOMER's site: "GTC Discount With Blink From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, a...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 19:59:00
|
86. New Freighter Proposition - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Katherine Raven wrote: I could suggest a small compromise, what if fitted ships could be carried by the existing freighters? No new ships, no new rules, not real balance changes (you technically can already do this, it just involves using couri...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 17:50:00
|
87. "DSCAN DISRUPTOR" in patch Rubicon 1.1. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote: Tauranon wrote: the immediate up in arms won't be about blocking d-scan its about identifying for CCP that... (a) nobody wants to press d-scan a thousand times for no enemy reported. its a horrible way of telling the ...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 16:25:00
|
88. CFC Declares War on N3. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
it probably wasn't posted due to how few people really care. also the "honourable third parties" was pretty much already a war declaration.
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 13:27:00
|
89. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Kate stark wrote: You've still got acceleration gates to contend with, though. some sites have 3 of them to go through before you get to the fleet! We also have intel systems in place giving live updates on where and what...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 13:11:00
|
90. "DSCAN DISRUPTOR" in patch Rubicon 1.1. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Kate stark wrote: Barrogh Habalu wrote: Even if it's true, we don't know how it will work. which is why we make threads like this, then speculate wildly speculate wildly, and realise fozzie is reading it so if we acci...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 13:07:00
|
91. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Kate stark wrote: y'ain't hot dropping **** in incursion systems. they're cyno jammed. Or, so i thought. well then, i guess when fleets of frigs are hitting 80+ people i guess you really are ****** if some one picks a fight...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 13:06:00
|
92. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Kate stark wrote: baltec1 wrote: Kate stark wrote: I wouldn't have thought that small gangs would be much of an issue for a HQ fleet to deal with. Most small to mid gangs will rip them apart. They might be the most...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 13:01:00
|
93. Announcement:Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anya Klibor wrote: From SOMER's site: "GTC Discount With Blink From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, and use the coupon code "SOMERBLINK" at checko...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:56:00
|
94. "DSCAN DISRUPTOR" in patch Rubicon 1.1. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Barrogh Habalu wrote: Even if it's true, we don't know how it will work. which is why we make threads like this, then speculate wildly speculate wildly, and realise fozzie is reading it so if we accidentally make a half decent suggestion he ...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:51:00
|
95. "Metacide" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I feel it'd be easiest to just scrap meta 1-3, keep 4 as a nice lower skill/fitting requirement option to t2, and ensure t2 is actually better than meta 4 in all cases. It's also less for new players to digest than having to remember "meta 2 turre...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:48:00
|
96. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Kate stark wrote: I wouldn't have thought that small gangs would be much of an issue for a HQ fleet to deal with. Most small to mid gangs will rip them apart. They might be the most advanced pve small gang setups but the...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:43:00
|
97. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Kate stark wrote: So would you rather have more null sec incursions for the isk making potential, or less of them due to the irritating system effects? Less. I ******* hate the damn things. Fair enough.
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:34:00
|
98. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Kate stark wrote: have you tried doing incursions in null sec? just curious. Only when they came out. They are magnets for small gangs so nobody bothers anymore. I wouldn't have thought that small gangs would be much o...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:31:00
|
99. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Kate stark wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: Kate stark wrote: have you tried doing incursions in null sec? just curious. Not a viable solution since an incursion only stays for about a week before it completes a...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:28:00
|
100. Sisters of EVE missions, the most profitable (stable) high-sec solo income now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
marVLs wrote: - Incursions are 150-200m/h including LP but it's hard to get always in fleet and you need to have pimped ship and skills, there are almost no breaks if You'r in fleet fleets can be difficult to get in to during afternoons/even...
- by Kate stark - at 2013.12.15 12:25:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |